<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>For Economic Justice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foreconomicjustice.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foreconomicjustice.org</link>
	<description>Socialism has been discredited. Plutocracy is in the process of being discredited. Democratic capitalism has yet to be tried.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:15:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Democratizing Wealth And A Sustainable Future</title>
		<link>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8220/democratizing-wealth-and-a-sustainable-future/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=democratizing-wealth-and-a-sustainable-future</link>
		<comments>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8220/democratizing-wealth-and-a-sustainable-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Reber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreconomicjustice.org/?p=8220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democratizing Wealth and a Sustainable Future (Gar Alperovitz Q&#38;A with Dr. Norman G. Kurland) [Time Tag @ 46:42 - 56:35] http://youtu.be/L6XkxHFtLto?t=46m42s Published by the New American Foundation Published on May 23, 2013 Democratizing Wealth and a Sustainable Future A Conversation with Gar Alperovitz Perspective within the New Economy Movement Never before have so many Americans been more [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/L6XkxHFtLto" height="315" width="420" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<p>Democratizing Wealth and a Sustainable Future<br />
(Gar Alperovitz Q&amp;A with Dr. <a href="https://www.facebook.com/norman.kurland?directed_target_id=120859131304730" data-hovercard="/ajax/hovercard/user.php?id=1450208870&amp;extragetparams=%7B%22directed_target_id%22%3A120859131304730%7D">Norman G</a>. Kurland)<br />
[Time Tag @ 46:42 - 56:35]<br />
<a href="http://youtu.be/L6XkxHFtLto?t=46m42s" target="_blank" rel="nofollow nofollow">http://youtu.be/<wbr />L6XkxHFtLto?t=46m42s</a></p>
<p>Published by the New American Foundation</p>
<p id="watch-uploader-info"><strong>Published on May 23, 2013</strong></p>
<div id="watch-description-text">
<p id="eow-description">Democratizing Wealth and a Sustainable Future<br />
A Conversation with Gar Alperovitz</p>
<p>Perspective within the New Economy Movement</p>
<p>Never before have so many Americans been more frustrated with our economic system, more fearful that it is failing, or more open to fresh ideas about a new one. In his new book, Gar Alperovitz presents a case for democratizing wealth as a foundation for a new and sustainable economy. He describes what it means to build a new system to replace the crumbling one, and offers specific policy ideas for how we might begin the process by starting with a transformation of the banking industry and health care sector. The paradox of this process is that the policies and institutions most capable of managing a large-scale and powerful economy are the ones that can strengthen communities in diverse ways.</p>
<p>PARTICIPANTS</p>
<p>Gar Alperovitz (http://www.garalperovitz.com/)<br />
Professor, University of Maryland<br />
Founding Principal, The Democracy Collaborative<br />
Author, What then Must We Do? Democratizing Wealth and Building a Community-Sustaining Economy from the Ground Up</p>
<p>Reid Cramer<br />
Director, Asset Building Program, New America Foundation</p>
<p>Norman Kurland of the Center for Economic and Social Justice (<a href="www.cesj.org">www.cesj.org</a>) and Gar Alperovitz are two giant thinkers exploring a new economic paradigm about much of which they largely agree. Missing from the discussion has been the main point critical to the integrity of its architecture and the main point on which they disagree. That is, collective ownership (Alperovitz) versus broad-based individual ownership (Kurland) of the productive capital means of production in the FUTURE.</p>
<p>Go to “minute 49” of the video to see Norm’s questions and Gar’s responses.</p>
<div><span>Note: The intro, in his last book &#8220;<em>Democracy and Economic Power</em>&#8221; [copyright 1986, 1991] Louis O. Kelso said:</span></div>
<div></div>
<div><span>&#8220;This book, <em>Democracy and Economic Power: Extending the ESOP Revolution</em>, deals with the ESOP aspect of investment banking; an aspect that, by analogy to Aristotle&#8217;s description of medicine and agriculture as cooperative art, identifies ESOP investment banking as a cooperative art, targeted both at financing capital requirements for enterprises, and at enlarging the natural job-oriented earning power of employees with capital-sourced earning power; ultimately, providing them with lifetime capital-worker employment.&#8221;</span></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8220/democratizing-wealth-and-a-sustainable-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Audacity Of Apple&#8217;s &#8220;Ingenuity&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8211/the-audacity-of-apples-ingenuity/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-audacity-of-apples-ingenuity</link>
		<comments>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8211/the-audacity-of-apples-ingenuity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Reber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreconomicjustice.org/?p=8211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 23, 2013, Thom Hartmann on his show stated: This week, Apple CEO Tim Cook was questioned in a Congressional Hearing about his company&#8217;s complex scheme to avoid paying taxes.  According to Mr. Cook, the company&#8217;s stash of billions of dollars in overseas shell corporations was not tax dodging – it was ingenuity.  And, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 23, 2013, Thom Hartmann on his show stated:</p>
<blockquote><p>This week, Apple CEO Tim Cook was questioned in a Congressional Hearing about his company&#8217;s complex scheme to avoid paying taxes.  According to Mr. Cook, the company&#8217;s stash of billions of dollars in overseas shell corporations was not tax dodging – it was ingenuity.  And, just in case anyone actually fell for the tech company&#8217;s creative explanation, Mark Gongloff of the Huffington Post shared an incredible chart, which illustrates exactly how unjust our nation&#8217;s tax system has really become.</p>
<p>The chart was produced by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, and it shows how the sources of federal revenue have changed over several decades.  In 1950, corporations contributed over 30 percent to our nation&#8217;s revenue, and individual income and payroll taxes made up about 45 percent.  But today, corporations only contribute 17 percent, and individuals are paying for over 60 percent of federal revenue.</p>
<p>So, despite all the Republican claims about the U.S. having the world&#8217;s highest tax rate – corporations are contributing less to our nation than ever before.  Yet, corporate executives like Tim Cook have the audacity to say we should be celebrating their “ingenuity.”  These companies make the huge profits they have been raking in by using the commons that our tax dollars develop and maintain.</p>
<p>Without roads and bridges, communications systems and utilities, corporations couldn&#8217;t get their products into the hands of hard-working Americans.  They should be paying for the privilege to do business here.  American tax payers should not be picking up a larger share of the tab, while corporate executives hold on to an ever-increasing share of the profits.  Let&#8217;s tell companies like Apple that we&#8217;ll celebrate their ingenuity just as soon as they start paying their fair share.</p></blockquote>
<div>If you look objectively at the operations of Apple Inc. and other large tech companies, one will realize that the number one capital asset their stockowners own is intangible intellectual property––namely patents. As well, an analysis of the ownership of Apple Inc. and others would reveal that a relative few own the bulk of the company, with the exception that those in the highest employed positions receive stock portfolios as part of the compensation package. Then too there are millions of Americans who have invested their savings to purchase secondary Apple stock on the stock exchanges. But the reality is that the majority of this non-inner circle ownership class&#8217; holdings are relatively small in comparison. Also significant, is the fact that the company retains the  bulk of the profits and does not pay near the dividend income owed the stockowners.</div>
<div></div>
<div>CEO Tim Cook tries to portray Apple Inc. as a company &#8220;bound by lofty ideals, a strong moral compass and a recognition of its impact on the world,&#8221; yet the company uses slave-labor workers employed by FoxConn in China to build their products, and the vast employed majority outside manufacturing to sell and service their products, all at relatively low-pay compared to the executive class and the scientists and engineers who are  encouraged to work to destroy employment by making the capital owners of the company more productive by increasing the stock value of their holdings. How much employment can be destroyed by substituting machines for people is a measure of their success––always focused on producing at the lowest cost. Only the people who already own productive capital are the beneficiaries of their work, as they systematically concentrate more and more capital ownership in their stationary 1 percent ranks.</div>
<div></div>
<div>If Cook wanted to really have a positive impact on the world he would lead his Board of Directors to finance future growth of Apple Inc. using an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) and enable ALL the employees of Apple to become future stock owners and pay for their acquisition out of the tax-free future corporate earnings of the growth investments. Instead the company uses retained earnings financing or debt financing to further concentrate the stock holdings and profits of the existing ownership class, and other measures to &#8220;legally&#8221; escape paying taxes on the profits generated.</div>
<div></div>
<div>If the United States Congress wanted to shine a spotlight on Apple Inc. as an exemplar of a system that is producing nonsensical results, then there needs to be pressure put on the <a id="ORGOV0000134152" title="U.S. Senate Committee on Finance" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/government/u.s.-senate-committee-on-finance-ORGOV0000134152.topic">Senate Finance Committee</a> to write more sensible legislation that avoids the negative tax consequences of encouraging more concentrated ownership of the FUTURE productive capital assets as the purpose of economic growth, and connect EVERY American as an owner so that they can participate in the production of products and services beyond that of declining job opportunities and welfare substance.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Such goals and policies are the subject of my article &#8221;The Path To Sustainable Economic Growth&#8221; at <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/sustainable-economic-growth_b_3141721.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/sustainable-economic-growth_b_3141721.html</a> and the article entitled &#8220;The Solution To America&#8217;s Economic Decline&#8221; at <a href="http://www.nationofchange.org/solution-america-s-economic-decline-1367588690">http://www.nationofchange.org/solution-america-s-economic-decline-1367588690</a></div>
<p><a href="http://www.thomhartmann.com/blog/2013/05/audacity-apples-ingenuity">http://www.thomhartmann.com/blog/2013/05/audacity-apples-ingenuity</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8211/the-audacity-of-apples-ingenuity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed Tax Fairness Act</title>
		<link>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8204/proposed-tax-fairness-act/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=proposed-tax-fairness-act</link>
		<comments>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8204/proposed-tax-fairness-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Reber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreconomicjustice.org/?p=8204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) have introduced a bill to stop profitable corporations from sheltering income in the Cayman Islands and other tax havens. The legislation also would end tax breaks for companies that ship jobs and factories overseas. “At a time when we have a $16.5 trillion national debt and an [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) have introduced a bill to stop profitable corporations from sheltering income in the Cayman Islands and other tax havens. The legislation also would end tax breaks for companies that ship jobs and factories overseas.</p>
<blockquote><p>“At a time when we have a $16.5 trillion national debt and an unsustainable federal deficit; at a time when roughly one-quarter of the largest corporations in America are paying no federal income taxes; and at a time when corporate profits are at an all-time high, it is past time for corporate America to contribute significantly to deficit reduction,” said Sanders, a member of the Senate Budget Committee.<br />
“Even as profits grow to record levels, corporations’ share of tax revenues paid has dropped significantly in recent decades. Sen. Sanders and I are offering a comprehensive and commonsense solution that would eliminate tax subsidizes for big oil companies and corporations that are shipping jobs and profits overseas,” Schakowsky said.</p>
<p>The legislation “would increase investment, employment and wages in the United States,” said Richard L. Trumka, president of the AFL-CIO. Mary Kay Henry, the Service Employees International Union president, said the proposal would “raise revenue, restore fairness to our tax code and create good jobs in the U.S.”<br />
Under current law, U.S. corporations are allowed to defer or delay U.S. income taxes on overseas profits until the money is brought back into the United States. U.S. corporations are also provided foreign tax credits to offset the amount of taxes paid to other countries.</p>
<p>According to a 2008 Government Accountability Office Report, 83 of the Fortune 100 companies in the United States use offshore tax havens to lower their taxes. Today, U.S. corporations have an estimated $1.7 trillion of un-repatriated foreign profits sitting offshore.<br />
Sanders also released a report today on how 31 corporations represented by the Business Roundtable have avoided $128 billion in federal income taxes by setting up more than 500 subsidiaries in tax haven countries. The Business Roundtable recently released a report calling for Congress to slash Social Security and Medicare benefits something that Sanders called “shameless.”</p>
<p>The Corporate Tax Fairness Act would require U.S. companies to pay taxes on all of their income by ending the deferral of foreign source income.</p>
<p>Under the legislation proposed by Sanders and Schakowsky, corporations would pay U.S. taxes on their offshore profits as they are earned. The legislation would take away the tax incentives for corporations to move jobs offshore or to shift profits offshore because the U.S. would tax their profits no matter where they are generated.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.sanders.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/CORPTA%20FAIRNESSFACTSHEET.pdf">http://www.sanders.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/CORPTA%20FAIRNESSFACTSHEET.pdf</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sanders.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/TaxHavens-%20BIll.pdf">http://www.sanders.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/TaxHavens-%20BIll.pdf</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sanders.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Tax-Dodge-Report-3.pdf">http://www.sanders.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Tax-Dodge-Report-3.pdf</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=f8e29aae-dda3-4af9-a8e2-c6df481d1ffa">http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=f8e29aae-dda3-4af9-a8e2-c6df481d1ffa</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/media/listen/?m=139aea44-3b9b-4915-8083-b8754e7cc67c">http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/media/listen/?m=139aea44-3b9b-4915-8083-b8754e7cc67c</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8204/proposed-tax-fairness-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul Says Government Owes Tax-Dodging Apple An Apology (Video)</title>
		<link>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8198/rand-paul-says-government-owes-tax-dodging-apple-an-apology-video/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rand-paul-says-government-owes-tax-dodging-apple-an-apology-video</link>
		<comments>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8198/rand-paul-says-government-owes-tax-dodging-apple-an-apology-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Reber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreconomicjustice.org/?p=8198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 22, 2013, Americans Against The Tea Party write on www.aattp.org: Rand Paul says the government should “just apologize” to the tax-dodgers at Apple who are reportedly holding billions in overseas tax-havens as part of a crafty legal scheme to dodge Uncle Sam. Paul said: I’m offended by a government that convenes a hearing to bully one [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/pqI39GMbLLk" height="315" width="420" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<p>On May 22, 2013, Americans Against The Tea Party write on www.aattp.org:</p>
<blockquote><p>Rand Paul says the government should “just apologize” to the tax-dodgers at Apple who are <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2013/05/apple-tax-hearings-tim-cook-public-outrage.html" target="_blank">reportedly</a> holding billions in overseas tax-havens as part of a crafty legal scheme to dodge Uncle Sam.</p>
<p>Paul said: <strong>I’m offended by a government that convenes a hearing to bully one of America’s greatest success stories.  I’m offended by the spectacle of dragging in executives from an American company that is not doing anything illegal.  If anyone should be on trial here, it should be Congress.  I frankly think the committee should apologize to Apple.</strong></p>
<p>Don’t blame Paul though.  He’s <em>deeply</em> concerned about the federal deficit and all of this outrageous spending (for superfluous things like social safety nets for our children and elderly citizens, roads and disaster relief!), just not concerned enough to ask those who can afford it to pay their fair share.  Also, don’t blame him for citing Apple as “an American company” even though we all know they outsource much of their production to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/26/business/ieconomy-apples-ipad-and-the-human-costs-for-workers-in-china.html?pagewanted=all" target="_blank">Chinese worker</a><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/26/business/ieconomy-apples-ipad-and-the-human-costs-for-workers-in-china.html?pagewanted=all" target="_blank">s</a> who routinely attempt, and sometimes succeed, in committing suicide <em><strong>while on the job</strong></em>.  Randall is just doing what his corporate handlers tell him to–like a good little would-be presidential candidate should.</p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>If you look objectively at the operations of Apple Inc. and other large tech companies, one will realize that the number one capital asset their stockowners own is intangible intellectual property––namely patents. As well, an analysis of the ownership of Apple Inc. and others would reveal that a relative few own the bulk of the company, with the exception that those in the highest employed positions receive stock portfolios as part of the compensation package. Then too there are millions of Americans who have invested their savings to purchase second hand Apple stock on the stock exchanges. But the reality is that the majority of this non-inner circle ownership class&#8217; holdings are relatively small in comparison. Also significant, is the fact that the company retains the  bulk of the profits and does not pay near the dividend income owed the stockowners.</div>
<div></div>
<div>CEO Tim Cook tries to portray Apple Inc. as a company &#8220;bound by lofty ideals, a strong moral compass and a recognition of its impact on the world,&#8221; yet the company uses slave-labor workers employed by FoxConn in China to build their products, and the vast employed majority outside manufacturing to sell and service their products, all at relatively low-pay compared to the executive class and the scientists and engineers who are  encouraged to work to destroy employment by making the capital owners of the company more productive by increasing the stock value of their holdings. How much employment can be destroyed by substituting machines for people is a measure of their success––always focused on producing at the lowest cost. Only the people who already own productive capital are the beneficiaries of their work, as they systematically concentrate more and more capital ownership in their stationary 1 percent ranks.</div>
<div></div>
<div>If Cook wanted to really have a positive impact on the world he would lead his Board of Directors to finance future growth of Apple Inc. using an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) and enable ALL the employees of Apple to become future stock owners and pay for their acquisition out of the tax-free future corporate earnings of the growth investments. Instead the company uses retained earnings financing or debt financing to further concentrate the stock holdings and profits of the existing ownership class, and other measures to &#8220;legally&#8221; escape paying taxes on the profits generated.</div>
<div></div>
<div>If the United States Congress wanted to shine a spotlight on Apple Inc. as an exemplar of a system that is producing nonsensical results, then there needs to be pressure put on the <a id="ORGOV0000134152" title="U.S. Senate Committee on Finance" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/government/u.s.-senate-committee-on-finance-ORGOV0000134152.topic">Senate Finance Committee</a> to write more sensible legislation that avoids the negative tax consequences of encouraging more concentrated ownership of the FUTURE productive capital assets as the purpose of economic growth, and connect EVERY American as an owner so that they can participate in the production of products and services beyond that of declining job opportunities and welfare substance.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Such goals and policies are the subject of my article &#8221;The Path To Sustainable Economic Growth&#8221; at <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/sustainable-economic-growth_b_3141721.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/sustainable-economic-growth_b_3141721.html</a> and the article entitled &#8220;The Solution To America&#8217;s Economic Decline&#8221; at <a href="http://www.nationofchange.org/solution-america-s-economic-decline-1367588690">http://www.nationofchange.org/solution-america-s-economic-decline-1367588690</a></div>
<p><a href="http://aattp.org/rand-paul-says-gov-owes-tax-dodging-apple-an-apology-video/">http://aattp.org/rand-paul-says-gov-owes-tax-dodging-apple-an-apology-video/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8198/rand-paul-says-government-owes-tax-dodging-apple-an-apology-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tesla Motors Pays Off Department Of Energy Advanced Technology Loan</title>
		<link>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8187/tesla-motors-pays-off-department-of-energy-advanced-technology-loan/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tesla-motors-pays-off-department-of-energy-advanced-technology-loan</link>
		<comments>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8187/tesla-motors-pays-off-department-of-energy-advanced-technology-loan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Reber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreconomicjustice.org/?p=8187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 22, 2013, Jerry Hirsch writes in the Los Angeles Times: Upstart electric car maker Tesla Motors on Wednesday paid off a Department Energy loan that had become a political hot potato. Tesla owed the federal government $451.8 million on a loan that was part of a special program to develop alternative fuel vehicles and renewable energy [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://foreconomicjustice.org/8187/tesla-motors-pays-off-department-of-energy-advanced-technology-loan/apphoto_factory-town/" rel="attachment wp-att-8188"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-8188" alt="APphoto_Factory Town" src="http://foreconomicjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/lat-loantesla-wre0009652878-20130502.jpeg" width="600" height="370" /></a></p>
<p>On May 22, 2013, Jerry Hirsch writes in the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Upstart electric car maker <a title="Tesla Motors, Inc." href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/economy-business-finance/manufacturing-engineering/automotive-equipment/tesla-motors-inc.-ORCRP006147.topic">Tesla Motors</a> on Wednesday paid off a Department Energy loan that had become a political hot potato.</p></blockquote>
<div>
<blockquote><p>Tesla owed the federal government $451.8 million on a loan that was part of a special program to develop alternative fuel vehicles and renewable energy sources.</p></blockquote>
<div>
<blockquote><p>The Energy Department’s loan program, which includes major automakers such as Nissan’s U.S. division, gained notoriety after the 2011 bankruptcy of <a title="Solyndra LLC" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/economy-business-finance/energy-resource-industries/alternative-energy/solyndra-llc-ORCRP0017617.topic">Solyndra</a>, the Fremont solar panel maker that cost taxpayers more than $400 million.</p>
<p>Last month, Fisker Automotive of Anaheim defaulted on a similar loan, which could cost taxpayers $171 million.</p>
<p>“When you’re talking about cutting-edge clean energy technologies, not every investment will succeed,”  said Energy Secretary <a title="Ernest J. Moniz" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/government/ernest-j.-moniz-PEPLT0008975.topic">Ernest Moniz</a>, “ but today’s repayment is the latest indication that the Energy Department’s portfolio of more than 30 loans is delivering big results for the American economy while costing far less than anticipated.”</p></blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<p>Tesla Motors benefited from the <b>Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) Loan Program, </b>a $25 billion direct loan program funded by Congress in fall 2008 to provide debt capital to the <a title="Automobile industry in the United States" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automobile_industry_in_the_United_States">U.S. automotive industry</a> for the purpose of funding projects that help vehicles manufactured in the U.S. meet higher mileage requirements and <a title="United States energy independence" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_energy_independence">lessen U.S. dependence on foreign oil</a>. This program is unrelated to the <a title="United States Treasury Department" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Treasury_Department">United States Treasury Department</a>&#8216;s <a title="Troubled Asset Relief Program" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troubled_Asset_Relief_Program">Troubled Asset Relief Program</a> (TARP) which has been providing <a title="Bailout" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bailout">bailout</a> funding to two of the big three U.S. automakers.</p>
<p>In September 2012, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives passed a bill that limits the Energy&#8217;s Department&#8217;s power to issue loan guarantees for new green-energy projects, a move stemming from Solyndra&#8217;s failure.</p>
<p>This Congressional action flied in the face of President Obama&#8217;s proposed Jobs Act, which would have created an Infrastructure Bank that would provide loan guarantees to stimulate economic growth.</p>
<p>What is needed is a massive loan guarantee economic growth plan with aims to balance production and consumption by empowering EVERY American to acquire private, individual ownership in FUTURE wealth-creating, income-producing productive capital asset investments and pay for their loans out of the earnings of the investments.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, with Tesla Motors and others, the direct loans and loan guarantees do not stipulate the demonstration of broaden private, individual ownership among the employees of the companies receiving taxpayer financial support. Instead the direct loans and loan guarantees are pitch as JOB CREATION measures while completely hiding the fact that a privilege ownership class benefits as the owners of investment assets.</p>
<p>In the FUTURE ALL  direct loans and loan guarantees should stipulate that companies demonstrate broadened ownership of their companies by their employees and other Americans.</p>
<p>We need to lift ownership-concentrating Federal Reserve System credit barriers and other institutional barriers that have historically separated owners from non-owners and link tax and monetary reforms to the goal of expanded capital ownership. This can be done under the existing legal powers of each of the 12 Federal Reserve regional banks, and will not add to the already unsustainable debt of the Federal Government or raise taxes on ordinary taxpayers. We need to free the system of dependency on Wall Street or the accumulated savings and money power of the rich and super-rich who control Wall Street. The Federal Reserve System has stifled the growth of America’s productive capacity through its monetary policy by monetizing public-sector growth and mounting Federal deficits and “Wall Street” bailouts; by favoring speculation over investment; by shortchanging the capital credit needs of entrepreneurs, inventors, farmers, and workers; by increasing the dependency of with usurious consumer credit; and by perpetuating unjust capital credit and ownership barriers between rich Americans and those without savings. The Federal Reserve Bank should be used to provide interest-free capital credit (including only transaction and risk premiums) and monetize each capital formation transaction, determined by the same expertise that determines it today––management and banks––that each transaction is viably feasible so that there is virtually no risk in the Federal Reserve. The first layer of risk would be taken by the commercial credit insurers, backed by a new government corporation, the Capital Diffusion Reinsurance Corporation, through which the loans could be guaranteed. This entity would serve to seed the new policy direction and would fulfill the government’s responsibility for the health and prosperity of the American economy.</p>
<div>Our political leaders, academia, and the media fail to understand that our financial system has resulted in a fundamental imbalance between production and consumption. We have ignored the systematic income inequalities that persist and grow exponentially due to the steady progress of tectonic shifts in the technologies of production, shifting productive input from labor to the non-human factor of production––productive capital, as generally defined as land, structures, human-intelligent machines, superautomation, robotics, digital computerized automation, etc. Productive capital assets are OWNED by individuals and, respecting private property principles, those individuals are entitled to the earnings generated by such assets.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The significant problem has been the systematic denial of participation as capital owners on the part of the majority of consumers. While the wealthy ownership class has essentially rigged the financial system to their benefit, and by that is meant to continually concentrate ownership of productive capital among the richest Americans, the majority of Americans have been and are dependent on JOB CREATION. Yet, none of our political leaders, academia or the media addresses this inbalance  with the richest Americans entitled to income growth associated with productive capital ownership and the majority facing further job losses and degradation due to technological advancement.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Ordinary Americans of so-called &#8220;middle-class position&#8221; have used consumer debt financing as a means of bettering their life with an abundance of consumer products and services. The government has used income redistribution via taxation and national debt to prop up the economy with monies spent on supporting a massive military-industrial complex comprised of a small group of owners and millions of &#8220;employed&#8221; and various social programs to uplift the American majority&#8217;s life and prevent their decline into poverty––supported by government dependency.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The ONLY way out of this mess, if we are to not become a complete socialist or communist communal state governed by an elite class, is to embrace growth managed in such a way that EVERY American is empowered to acquire over time a viable wealth-creating, income-producing capital estate and pay for their acquisition out of the FUTURE earnings of the investment. Such is the precise means that the richest Americans continually advance their wealth and thus, income.</div>
<div></div>
<div>We need leaders who will put this issue before the national debate stage, and we need the media to put forth the questions whose answers will provide the financial mechanism specifics to reverse the ever dominant OWNERSHIP CONCENTRATION. Such concentration and the economic power that result is taking control of our representative government, with productive capital ownership channeled through plutocratic finance into fewer and fewer hands, as we continue to witness today with government by the wealthy evidenced at all levels.</div>
<p>We are absent a national discussion of where consumers earn the money to buy products and services and the nature of capital ownership, and instead argue about policies to redistribute income or not to redistribute income. If Americans do not demand that the holders of the office of the presidency of the United States, the Senate, and the Congress address these issues, we will have wasted the opportunity to steer the American economy in a direction that will broaden affluence. We have adequate resources, adequate knowhow, and adequate manpower to produce general affluence, but we need as a society to properly and efficiently manage these resources while protecting and enhancing the environment so that our productive capital capability is sustainable and renewable. Such issues are the proper concern of government because of the human damage inflicted on our social fabric as well as to economic growth in which every citizen is fairly included in the American dream.</p>
<p>There are numerous solution specifics that should be implemented in addition to the reform of the Federal Reserve System.</p>
<p>We need to implement the Capital Homestead Act (CHA) (<a href="www.capitalhomestead.org">www.capitalhomestead.org</a>), which takes its lead from the Homestead Act of 1862. The Homestead Act offered the landless white citizens of America part-ownership of the country by giving them 160 acres of frontier land, free, if they produced on it income for themselves and their families for a period of five years. The slogan of the Capital Homestead Act is “Own Or Be Owned.” The Capital Homestead Act’s summary can be found at <a href="http://www.cesj.org/homestead/summary-cha.htm">http://www.cesj.org/homestead/summary-cha.htm</a> and at <a href="http://www.cesj.org/about/programs/declarations/ monetaryjustice.htm">http://www.cesj.org/about/programs/declarations/ monetaryjustice.htm</a>.</p>
<p>We need to support new justice-committed leaders, especially those who want to end the corruption built into our exclusionary system of monopoly capitalism––the main source of corruption of any political system, democratic or otherwise.</p>
<p>But to develop those leaders we need a national airing and debate and a call for an &#8220;economic Marshall Plan.&#8221; We have the intelligence; we just have not been focused on OWNERSHIP CREATION, and instead have limited our discussion and policy-making to JOB CREATION––a dead-end proposition in light of the continuing march of technological innovation and invention.</p>
<p>We need to radically overhaul the Federal tax system and monetary policies and institute proposals to get money power to the 99 percent of American citizens who now only rely on their labor worker earnings. Under the Just Third Way more just and simple tax system, the following is proposed:</p>
<p>• Eliminate all tax loopholes and subsidies,</p>
<p>• Provide an exemption of $100,000 for a family of four to meet their ordinary living needs,</p>
<p>• Encourage corporations to pay out all their profits as taxable personal incomes to avoid paying corporate income taxes and to finance their growth by issuing new full dividend payout shares for broad-based citizen ownership,</p>
<p>• Eliminate the payroll tax on workers and their employers, but</p>
<p>• Pay out of general revenues for all promises for Social Security, Medicare, Medicare, government pensions, health, education, rent and subsistence vouchers for the poor until their new jobs and ownership accumulations provide new incomes to substitute for the taxpayer dollars to fill these needs.</p>
<p>• The tax rate would be a single rate for all incomes from all sources above the personal exemption levels so that the budget could be balanced automatically and even allow the government to pay off the growing unsustainable long-term debt, but the poor would pay the first dollar over their exemption levels as the hedge fund operator and others now earning billions of dollars from capital gains, dividends, rents and other property incomes which under some tax proposals would be exempted from any taxes.</p>
<p>• As a substitute for inheritance and gift taxes, a transfer tax would be imposed on the recipients whose holdings exceeded $1 million, thus encouraging the super-rich to spread out their monopoly-sized estates to all members of their family, friends, servants and workers who helped create their fortunes, teachers, health workers, police, other public servants, military veterans, artists, the poor and the disabled.</p>
<p>• The Federal Reserve would stop monetizing unproductive debt, including bailouts of banks &#8220;too big to fail&#8221; and Wall Street derivatives speculators, and</p>
<p>• Begin creating an asset-backed currency that could enable every man, woman and child to establish a Capital Homestead Account or &#8220;CHA&#8221; (a super-IRA or asset tax-shelter for citizens) at their local bank to acquire a growing dividend-bearing stock portfolio to supplement their incomes from work and all other sources of income.</p>
<p>• The CHA would process an equal allocation of productive credit to every citizen exclusively for purchasing full-dividend payout shares in companies needing funds for growing the economy and private sector jobs for local, national and global markets,</p>
<p>• The shares would be purchased on credit wholly backed by projected &#8220;future savings&#8221; in the form of new productive capital assets as well as the future marketable goods and services produced by the newly added technology, renewable energy systems, plant, rentable space and infrastructure added to the economy.</p>
<p>• Risk of default on each stock acquisition loan would be covered by private sector capital credit risk insurance and reinsurance, but</p>
<p>• Would not require citizens to reduce their funds for consumption to purchase shares.</p>
<p>The end result is that citizens would become empowered as owners to meet their own consumption needs and government would become more dependent on economically independent citizens, thus reversing current global trends where all citizens will eventually become dependent for their economic well-being on our only legitimate monopoly –– the State –– and whatever elite controls the coercive powers of government.</p>
<p>We need ordinary Americans to step up and demand that the OWNERSHIP issue is addressed. This is the last option to provide prosperity, opportunity, and economic justice for America&#8217;s 99 percent majority.</p>
<p>Implementing such policies will enable America to realize its potential for an affluent future for EVERYONE..</p>
<p>To those who believe that we are doomed, consider that the haves represent a tiny fraction of humanity. The ideas that address OWNERSHIP CREATION will split them between those who see the point and understand that they would benefit everyone without taking anything away from them during their lives, and those who want to keep ownership in an exclusive club. The latter cannot publicly attack the institution of private property without threatening the legal foundation that gives them their monopoly over the money system and the ownership system.</p>
<p>We need leadership to awaken all American citizens to force the politicians to follow the people and lift all legal barriers to universal capital ownership access by every man, woman, and child as a fundamental right of citizenship and the basis of personal liberty and empowerment. The goal should be to enable every man, woman, and child to become an owner of ever-advancing labor-displacing technologies, new and sustainable energy systems, new rentable space, new enterprises, new infrastructure assets, and productive land and natural resources as a growing and independent source of their future incomes.</p>
<p>The emphasis on the systemic injustices of monopoly capitalism can only be addressed by comprehensive reforms to the tax, monetary and inheritance policies favoring the top 1 percent at the expense of the 99 percent. The current system perpetuates budget deficits and unsustainable government debt, underutilized workers, a lack of financing for financing advanced energy and green technologies, and outsourcing of U.S. industrial jobs to low-wage countries, trade deficits, shrinking consumption incomes among the poor and middle class, and conventional methods for financing productive growth that increase the ownership and power gaps between the top 1 percent and the 90 percent whose combined ownership accumulations are already less than the elite whose money power is widely known as the source of political corruption and the breakdown of political democracy.</p>
<p>The question that requires an answer is now timely before us. It was first posed by binary economist Louis Kelso in the 1950s but has never been thoroughly discussed on the national stage. Nor has there been the proper education of our citizenry that addresses what economic justice is and what ownership is. Therefore, by ignoring such issues of economic justice and ownership, our leaders are ignoring the concentration of power through ownership of productive capital, with the result of denying the 99 percenters equal opportunity to become capital owners. The question, as posed by Kelso is: “how are all individuals to be adequately productive when a tiny minority (capital workers) produce a major share and the vast majority (labor workers), a minor share of total goods and service,” and thus, “how do we get from a world in which the most productive factor—physical capital—is owned by a handful of people, to a world where the same factor is owned by a majority—and ultimately 100 percent—of the consumers, while respecting all the constitutional rights of present capital owners?”</p>
<p>Please see my article &#8221;The Absent Conversation: Who Should Own America?&#8221; published by <em>The Huffington Post</em> at <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/who-should-own-america_b_2040592.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/who-should-own-america_b_2040592.html</a> and by OpEd News at <a href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/THE-Absent-Conversation--by-Gary-Reber-130429-498.html">http://www.opednews.com/articles/THE-Absent-Conversation&#8211;by-Gary-Reber-130429-498.html</a></p>
<p>Also see &#8220;The Path To Eradicating Poverty In America&#8221; at <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/the-path-to-eradicating-p_b_3017072.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/the-path-to-eradicating-p_b_3017072.html</a> and &#8220;The Path To Sustainable Economic Growth&#8221; at <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/sustainable-economic-growth_b_3141721.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/sustainable-economic-growth_b_3141721.html</a>, and the article entitled &#8220;The Solution To America&#8217;s Economic Decline&#8221; at <a href="http://www.nationofchange.org/solution-america-s-economic-decline-1367588690">http://www.nationofchange.org/solution-america-s-economic-decline-1367588690</a></p>
<p>Also follow the Center for Economic and Social Justice at <a href="www.cesj.org">www.cesj.org</a> and <a href="http://capitalhomestead.org/">http://capitalhomestead.org/</a> Join the OWN Team to advocate OWNERSHIP CREATION <a href="at http://capitalhomestead.org/group/the-on-team">at http://capitalhomestead.org/group/the-on-team</a></p>
<p>Also see The Kelso Institute at <a href="http://www.kelsoinstitute.org/">http://www.kelsoinstitute.org/</a></p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/autos/la-fi-hy-tesla-pays-off-doe-loan-20130522,0,1821243.story">http://www.latimes.com/business/autos/la-fi-hy-tesla-pays-off-doe-loan-20130522,0,1821243.story</a></b></p>
<p><b> </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8187/tesla-motors-pays-off-department-of-energy-advanced-technology-loan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is ‘Poor’ In America? Most Say $60K Or Less</title>
		<link>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8180/what-is-poor-in-america-most-say-60k-or-less/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-is-poor-in-america-most-say-60k-or-less</link>
		<comments>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8180/what-is-poor-in-america-most-say-60k-or-less/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Reber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreconomicjustice.org/?p=8180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IOn May 21, 2013, Jeff Reeves writes on Slant.com: The poverty line in the U.S., according to the federal government, is just under $24,000. But most Americans say even if you make twice that, you won’t be very comfortable in their hometown. A recent survey by Gallup lays bare this stark financial reality, with the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IOn May 21, 2013, Jeff Reeves writes on Slant.com:</p>
<blockquote><p>The poverty line in the U.S., according to the federal government, is just under $24,000. But most Americans say even if you make twice that, you won’t be very comfortable in their hometown.</p>
<p>A recent survey by Gallup lays bare this stark financial reality, with the pollsters’ findings headlined: “<a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/162587/americans-say-family-four-needs-nearly-60k.aspx">Americans Say Family of Four Needs Nearly $60K to ‘Get By.’</a> ”</p>
<p>So is this a question of perception vs. reality, with poll respondents being too materialistic or confusing wants with needs? Or is this really what it means to be “poor” in America in 2013?</p></blockquote>
<div>As my friend Anthony Ramos states: &#8220;Imagine you were a head of a household working construction in the early 2000s. You found work in the suburbs building single family homes in a booming bedroom community about 30 minutes outside a major city, and put down roots there. But the Great Recession gutted your business and you were laid off. You don’t have the skills to work in technology or medicine, and even if you wanted to there aren’t any jobs nearby.</div>
<div>&#8220;What do you do?&#8221;</div>
<p>Sadly, the Great Recession or Depression continues and the reality is that millions and millions more are destined for poverty subsistence.</p>
<p>We need, going forth, to recognize that tectonic shifts in the technologies of production will increasingly replace human labor with non-human means of production, and without extending equal opportunities to own (not equal results but equal opportunity for capital credit) more millions and millions of Americans will be displaced from their jobs and not be able to find a job, especially a job with decent wage or salary earnings to support a family. Then what? The hoggist greed of narrow minded, money-focused own-at-all-cost hoarders, needs to be confronted and opportunities for FUTURE private, individual ownership of FUTURE economic growth dramatically expanded to enable EVERY American to become a capital share owner in the assets of the major corporations that produce the bulk of our products and services, all financed using insured capital credit loans that will pay for themselves.</p>
<p>See my article &#8221;The Path To Eradicating Poverty In America&#8221; at <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/the-path-to-eradicating-p_b_3017072.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/the-path-to-eradicating-p_b_3017072.html</a> and &#8220;The Path To Sustainable Economic Growth&#8221; at <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/sustainable-economic-growth_b_3141721.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/sustainable-economic-growth_b_3141721.html</a>, and the article entitled &#8220;The Solution To America&#8217;s Economic Decline&#8221; at <a href="http://www.nationofchange.org/solution-america-s-economic-decline-1367588690">http://www.nationofchange.org/solution-america-s-economic-decline-1367588690</a></p>
<p>Support the Capital Homestead Act <a href="at http://www.cesj.org/homestead/index.htm">at http://www.cesj.org/homestead/index.htm</a> and <a href="http://www.cesj.org/homestead/summary-cha.htm">http://www.cesj.org/homestead/summary-cha.htm</a></p>
<p><a href="http://slant.investorplace.com/2013/05/what-is-poor-in-america-most-say-60k-or-less/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+InvestorPlace+%28InvestorPlace%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader#ixzz2TzBTmEOJ">http://slant.investorplace.com/2013/05/what-is-poor-in-america-most-say-60k-or-less/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+InvestorPlace+%28InvestorPlace%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader#ixzz2TzBTmEOJ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8180/what-is-poor-in-america-most-say-60k-or-less/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawmakers Grill Apple Execs Over Tax Strategy</title>
		<link>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8176/lawmakers-grill-apple-execs-over-tax-strategy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=lawmakers-grill-apple-execs-over-tax-strategy</link>
		<comments>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8176/lawmakers-grill-apple-execs-over-tax-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Reber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreconomicjustice.org/?p=8176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 22, 2013, Chris O&#8217;Brien and Jim Puzzanghera write in the Los Angeles Times: The hearing illustrated a conundrum for some legislators: They&#8217;re critical of Apple&#8217;s tax avoidance practices but recognize the company is a job-creating giant that produces some of the world&#8217;s most popular gadgets. &#8220;Apple executives want the public to focus on the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 22, 2013, Chris O&#8217;Brien and Jim Puzzanghera write in the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The hearing illustrated a conundrum for some legislators: They&#8217;re critical of Apple&#8217;s tax avoidance practices but recognize the company is a job-creating giant that produces some of the world&#8217;s most popular gadgets.</p>
<p>&#8220;Apple executives want the public to focus on the U.S. taxes the company has paid, but the real issue is the billions in taxes it has not paid, thanks to offshore tax strategies whose purpose is tax avoidance, pure and simple,&#8221; subcommittee Chairman <a id="PEPLT003901" title="Carl Levin" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/government/carl-levin-PEPLT003901.topic">Carl Levin</a> (D-Mich.) said during the hearing.</p>
<div> The hearing came one day after the subcommittee released a blistering report that detailed how Apple used an elaborate web of offshore subsidiaries to avoid paying at least $15 billion in U.S. taxes on $44 billion in foreign income from 2009 to 2012.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Of Apple&#8217;s $145 billion in cash as of April, about $102 billion is overseas. By keeping profits offshore, Apple reduced its effective tax rate to as low as 24.2% in 2011.</div>
<div></div>
<div>One of the Irish subsidiaries, Apple Operations International, which has no employees but reported $30 billion in income over the four years, has not filed an income tax return in any country for the last five years, the subcommittee investigation found.</div>
<div></div>
<div>&#8220;You shifted the economic rights to the most valuable thing you own, your intellectual property,&#8221; Levin said of Apple&#8217;s transfer of rights for its product sales in Europe, Asia and Africa to subsidiaries in <a id="PLGEO000008" title="Republic of Ireland" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/intl/republic-of-ireland-PLGEO000008.topic">Ireland</a>.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Cook delivered remarks aimed at portraying Apple as a company bound by lofty ideals, a strong moral compass and a recognition of its impact on the world.</div>
<div></div>
<div>&#8220;We don&#8217;t depend on tax gimmicks,&#8221; Cook said. &#8220;Honestly speaking, I don&#8217;t see it as unfair. I am not an unfair person. I would not preside over that.&#8221;</div>
<div></div>
<div>&#8220;Every company that has a huge presence, that has a huge number of employees, that pays a lot of taxes, that produces really good products, obviously that has an impact on people&#8217;s thinking,&#8221; Levin said of himself and his Senate colleagues. &#8220;But it&#8217;s important that we focus not just on the profits they pay taxes on, but on the greater percentage of profits that they don&#8217;t pay taxes on. And how do they avoid it?&#8221;</div>
</blockquote>
<div>If you look objectively at the operations of Apple Inc. and other large tech companies, one will realize that the number one capital asset their stockowners own is intangible intellectual property––namely patents. As well, an analysis of the ownership of Apple Inc. and others would reveal that a relative few own the bulk of the company, with the exception that those in the highest employed positions receive stock portfolios as part of the compensation package. Then too there are millions of Americans who have invested their savings to purchase second hand Apple stock on the stock exchanges. But the reality is that the majority of this non-inner circle ownership class&#8217; holdings are relatively small in comparison. Also significant, is the fact that the company retains the  bulk of the profits and does not pay near the dividend income owed the stockowners.</div>
<div></div>
<div>CEO Tim Cook tries to portray Apple Inc. as a company &#8220;bound by lofty ideals, a strong moral compass and a recognition of its impact on the world,&#8221; yet the company uses slave-labor workers employed by FoxConn in China to build their products, and the vast employed majority outside manufacturing to sell and service their products, all at relatively low-pay compared to the executive class and the scientists and engineers who are  encouraged to work to destroy employment by making the capital owners of the company more productive by increasing the stock value of their holdings. How much employment can be destroyed by substituting machines for people is a measure of their success––always focused on producing at the lowest cost. Only the people who already own productive capital are the beneficiaries of their work, as they systematically concentrate more and more capital ownership in their stationary 1 percent ranks.</div>
<div></div>
<div>If Cook wanted to really have a positive impact on the world he would lead his Board of Directors to finance future growth of Apple Inc. using an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) and enable ALL the employees of Apple to become future stock owners and pay for their acquisition out of the tax-free future corporate earnings of the growth investments. Instead the company uses retained earnings financing or debt financing to further concentrate the stock holdings and profits of the existing ownership class, and other measures to &#8220;legally&#8221; escape paying taxes on the profits generated.</div>
<div></div>
<div>If the United States Congress wanted to shine a spotlight on Apple Inc. as an exemplar of a system that is producing nonsensical results, then there needs to be pressure put on the <a id="ORGOV0000134152" title="U.S. Senate Committee on Finance" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/government/u.s.-senate-committee-on-finance-ORGOV0000134152.topic">Senate Finance Committee</a> to write more sensible legislation that avoids the negative tax consequences of encouraging more concentrated ownership of the FUTURE productive capital assets as the purpose of economic growth, and connect EVERY American as an owner so that they can participate in the production of products and services beyond that of declining job opportunities and welfare substance.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Such goals and policies are the subject of my article &#8221;The Path To Sustainable Economic Growth&#8221; at <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/sustainable-economic-growth_b_3141721.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/sustainable-economic-growth_b_3141721.html</a> and the article entitled &#8220;The Solution To America&#8217;s Economic Decline&#8221; at <a href="http://www.nationofchange.org/solution-america-s-economic-decline-1367588690">http://www.nationofchange.org/solution-america-s-economic-decline-1367588690</a></div>
<div></div>
<div><a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-apple-cook-hearing-20130522,0,1976484.story">http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-apple-cook-hearing-20130522,0,1976484.story</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8176/lawmakers-grill-apple-execs-over-tax-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s Youth Unemployment Problem Could Cost $18 Billion Over The Next Decade: Analysis</title>
		<link>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8165/americas-youth-unemployment-problem-could-cost-18-billion-over-the-next-decade-analysis/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=americas-youth-unemployment-problem-could-cost-18-billion-over-the-next-decade-analysis</link>
		<comments>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8165/americas-youth-unemployment-problem-could-cost-18-billion-over-the-next-decade-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Reber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreconomicjustice.org/?p=8165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; On May 20, 2013, Jullian Berman writes in The Huffington Post: America has a youth unemployment problem, and it’s not just the kids who are suffering. The nation is poised to lose $18 billion in wages over the next decade due to high youth unemployment, according to a Bloomberg Brief from Bloomberg Senior [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>On May 20, 2013, Jullian Berman writes in <em>The Huffington Post</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>America has a youth unemployment problem, and it’s not just the kids who are suffering.</p>
<p>The nation is poised to lose $18 billion in wages over the next decade due to high youth unemployment, according to a Bloomberg Brief from Bloomberg Senior Economist Joseph Brusuelas.</p>
<p>Brusuelas estimated that about 1.3 million 16- to 24-year-olds have been unemployed for six months or more. He came to the $18 billion figure using earlier research, which found six months of joblessness at age 22 results in a wage that’s 8 percent lower at age 23, 6 percent lower at 26 and 4 percent lower at 30. Still, the problem of lost wages due to unemployment could actually be much worse, Brusuelas told The Huffington Post.</p>
<p>“It’s a conservative estimate,” he said. “That really underestimates the true nature of the problem. My gut tells me that it’s much larger.”</p>
<p>Indeed, Brusuelas wrote in the note that if all of America&#8217;s 3.2 million unemployed youth stay jobless for an extended period, the U.S. will lose $44 billion over the next decade.</p></blockquote>
<div>
<p>Except for a relative few, the majority of the population, no matter how well educated, will not be able to find a job that pays sufficient wages or salaries to support a family or to prevent a lifestyle which is gradually being crippled by near poverty or poverty earnings. Thus, education is not the panacea, though it is critical for our future societal development. And younger, as well as older people will increasingly find it harder and harder to secure a well-paying job––for most, their ONLY source of income––and will find themselves dependent on taxpayer-supported government welfare, open and disguised.</p>
<p>For decades employment opportunity in the United States was such that the majority of people could obtain a job that could support their livelihood, though in most cases related to a family, it required the father and mother to both work, if they aspired to live a &#8220;middle class&#8221; lifestyle. With &#8220;Free Trade&#8221; those opportunities began to disintegrate as corporations sought to seek lower cost production taking advantage of global cheap labor rates and non-regulation, as well as lower tax rates abroad. This resulted in a chain reaction forcing more and more companies to out-source in order to stay competitive (thus the rise of China, Indiana Mexico, and other third-world nations economies).</p>
<p>At the same time, tectonic shifts in the technologies of production were exponentially occurring (and continue to do so), which resulted (and continues to result) in less job opportunities as production was shifted from people making things to &#8220;machines&#8221; of technology making things. The combination of cheap global labor costs and lower long-term invested &#8220;machine&#8221; costs has forced the value of labor downward and this will continue to be the reality. Our only way to far greater prosperity, opportunity, and economic justice is to embrace technological innovation and invention and the resulting human-intelligent machines, super-automation, robotics, digital computerized operations, etc as the primary economic engine of growth.</p>
<p>But significantly, unless we reform our system to empower EVERY American to acquire, via insured capital credit loans, viable full-ownership holdings (and thus entitlement to full-dividend earnings) in the companies growing the economy with the future earnings of the investments paying for the initial loan debt to acquire ownership, then the concentration of ownership of ALL future productive capital will continue to be amassed by a wealthy minority. Companies will continue to globalized in search of &#8220;customers with money&#8221; or simply fail as exponentially there will be fewer and fewer customers to support their businesses worldwide. Why, because the majority will be disconnected from the dividend income derived from the non-human means of production that is replacing the need for labor workers who earn wages and salaries.</p>
<p>Soon, industrial monopoly capitalism will reach its twin goals: concentration of productive capital ownership among the elite ownership class and work performed with as few labor workers and the lowest possible wages and salaries. The question to be answered is &#8220;Then what?&#8221;</p>
<p>The transition to the non-human factor of production has been occurring for decades but is now experiencing exponential development––the result of tectonic shifts in the technologies of production. As costs for computer-controlled machines become less than the cost of human workers, and the skills and productivity of the machines exceed those of human workers, then robot worker numbers will rapidly increase and enable our society to build architectural wonders, revitalize and redevelop our cities and build new cities of wonder and amazement, along with the support energy, transport, and communications systems. Super-automation and robotics is transforming the world of manufacturing as robots become lighter, more mobile, and more flexible with better sensing, perception, decision-making, and planning and control capabilities due to advanced digital computerization. Super-automation and robotics will dramatically improve productivity and provide skills and abilities previously unique to human workers. This will effectively increase the size of the labor work force beyond that provided by human workers, no matter what the level of education attained. With advanced human-level artificial intelligence, computer-controlled machines will be able to learn new knowledge and skills by simply downloading software. This means that the years of training that apply to personal human development will no longer apply to the further sophistication and operation of the machines. The result will be that productivity will soar while the need and demand for human labor will further decline.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, in the long term unless the vast majority of people have a substantial and viable source of income other than wages and salaries, the impact of technological innovation and invention as embodied in human-level artificial intelligence, machines, super-automation, robotics, digital computerized operations, etc will be devastating.</p>
<p>There are ONLY two options: either &#8220;Own or Be Owned.&#8221; The &#8220;Owned&#8221; model is what our society practices today and is expressed as monopoly capitalism (concentrated ownership) or socialism (taxpayer-supported redistributed social benefits). The &#8220;Own&#8221; model or what I and others term the Just Third Way (see http://www.cesj.org/thirdway/thirdway-intro.htm) has yet to be implemented on the scale necessary to empower every man, woman, and child to acquire private, individual ownership stakes in the future income-producing productive capital assets of the &#8220;machine age&#8221;––facilitated by the future earnings of their investments in the companies developing and employing this unprecedented economic power.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the disruptive nature of exponential growth in technology and its impact on productivity––tectonically shifting production of products and services from human workers to non-human means––is ignored by the economic establishment, academia, and our political leaders.</p>
<p>While the rate of technological progress is directly proportional to the number and quality of the people engaged in the fields of science and engineering, economic policy is the mechanism that fuels investment and development of technological innovation and invention. This is where education is critical to our future societal development.</p>
<p>Education should be encouraged and expanded. Everyone should have the opportunity to personally developed their own exceptional innate abilities and unlock their creativity.</p>
<p>But except for the personal development benefit to advancing one&#8217;s education, the reality is that far less &#8220;educated&#8221; people will be necessary in the long term to produce the products and services necessary and valued by society. This is due to the exponential development of human-level artificial intelligence, which is embodied in advanced automation and robotics.</p>
<p>Those college graduates who do succeed within the fields of science and engineering are hired to do what? Our scientists, engineers, and executive managers, who are not owners themselves of the companies they work for, except for those in the highest employed positions, are encouraged to work to destroy employment by making the capital owners&#8217; assets more productive. How much employment can be destroyed by substituting machines for people is a measure of their success––always focused on producing at the lowest cost.</p>
<p>We need to reform and restructure our economy and set as the GOAL broadened private, individual ownership of future wealth-creating productive capital among ALL Americans, with capital estates ever building as the economy grows. Without a policy shift to broaden productive capital ownership simultaneously with economic growth, further development of technology and globalization will undermine the American middle class and make it impossible for more than a minority of citizens to achieve middle-class status. By changing course, over time and within a few decades, our &#8220;machined-powered&#8221; growth economy would produce greater wealth, and widespread private, individual ownership would assure prosperity, opportunity, and general affluence for every citizen. Broadened productive capital ownership would strengthen our democracy and individuals and families would be less or non-dependent on government welfare, whether disguised or not.</p>
<p>This prosperous society is achievable because fortunately, in the near term, we can begin to grow our way out of the swelling unemployment and underemployment by increasing our investment significantly as a ratio of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), while simultaneously broadening private, individual ownership of future income-producing productive capital investments, thus initiating the process of empowering every man, woman and child to build over time a viable capital estate and reap the income generated. The key operative is BROADEN OWNERSHIP. Such investment would, in the short term, generate millions of new &#8220;real&#8221; productive jobs. The result would not only be that the GDP would dramatically grow but tax revenues from the high rate of economic growth would enable us to balance the federal budget, fully fund Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, provide Universal Health Care, Universal University Education, lower tax rates, and maintain a strong military, all simultaneously.</p>
<p>We have the opportunity to free economic growth from the &#8220;enslavement&#8221; of human labor and from the financial mechanisms that are based on the slavery of past savings. Technological progress though is no longer dependent on the number and quality of human workers. This fact will become obvious eventually to anyone who can think and analyze. That fact is the reality that human labor will cease to be the primary source of wealth production in the future. As a result we can expect over the long term that unemployment and underemployment will remain high indefinitely. But the difference will be that people will drop out of the labor force voluntarily because they will be able to live off their dividend earnings via their ownership portfolios. This will create swelling demand for human workers who want to continue working. And with both dividend and wage and salary incomes for everyone there will be more customers to purchase the products and services produced, which in turn will create further dividends and earnings, which will create more customers, etc.</p>
<p>While the future holds less promise for universal job employment due to the ever progressing contribution of technological-driven production using human-intelligent machines, super-automation, robotics and computerized operations, the jobs that will will be in demand will &#8220;require some mastery of technology, math, and science.&#8221; As long as working people are limited by earning income solely through their labor worker wages, they will be left behind by the continued gravitation of economic bounty toward the top 1 percent of the people that the system is rigged to benefit. If we don&#8217;t re-chart our economic policies to broaden private, individual ownership of new productive capital formation, then more troubling is that the continued stagnation of the American economy will further dim the economic hopes of America’s youth, no matter what their education level. The result will have profound long-term consequences for the nation’s economic health and further limit equal earning opportunity and spread income inequality. As the need for labor decreases and the power and leverage of productive capital increases, the gap between labor workers and productive capital asset owners will increase, and the conditions will become very frightening and very chaotic.</p>
<p>Sadly, our leaders are not prepared and are not preparing the American people for the coming economic collapse and the next Great Depression, due to their lack of wisdom and foresight to understand that full employment is not an objective of businesses. Companies strive to keep labor input and other costs at a minimum. Private sector job creation in numbers that match the pool of people willing and able to work is constantly being eroded by physical productive capital’s ever increasing role––as the use of human-intelligent machines, super-automation, robotics, digital computerized operations, etc. to produce products and services.</p>
<p>The question that requires an answer is now timely before us. It was first posed by binary economist Louis Kelso in the 1950s but has never been thoroughly discussed on the national stage. Nor has there been the proper education of our citizenry that addresses what economic justice is and what ownership is. Therefore, by ignoring such issues of economic justice and ownership, our leaders are ignoring the concentration of power through ownership of productive capital, with the result of denying the 99 percenters equal opportunity to become productive capital owners. The question, as posed by Kelso is: “how are all individuals to be adequately productive when a tiny minority (capital owners) produce a major share and the vast majority (labor workers), a minor share of total goods and service,” and thus, “how do we get from a world in which the most productive factor—–physical capital—–is owned by a handful of people, to a world where the same factor is owned by a majority—–and ultimately 100 percent—–of the consumers, while respecting all the constitutional rights of present capital owners?”</p>
<p>The path to prosperity, opportunity, and economic justice can be found in the writings about the Capital Homestead Act at <a href="http://www.cesj.org/homestead/index.htm">http://www.cesj.org/homestead/index.htm</a>. For more overviews related to this topic see my article &#8220;The Absent Conversation: Who Should Own America?&#8221; published by <em>The Huffington Post</em> at <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/who-should-own-america_b_2040592.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/who-should-own-america_b_2040592.html</a> and by <em>OpEd News</em> at <a href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/THE-Absent-Conversation--by-Gary-Reber-130429-498.html">http://www.opednews.com/articles/THE-Absent-Conversation&#8211;by-Gary-Reber-130429-498.html</a></p>
<p>Also see &#8220;The Path To Eradicating Poverty In America&#8221; at <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/the-path-to-eradicating-p_b_3017072.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/the-path-to-eradicating-p_b_3017072.html</a> and &#8220;The Path To Sustainable Economic Growth&#8221; at <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/sustainable-economic-growth_b_3141721.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/sustainable-economic-growth_b_3141721.html</a>, and the article entitled &#8220;The Solution To America&#8217;s Economic Decline&#8221; at <a href="http://www.nationofchange.org/solution-america-s-economic-decline-1367588690">http://www.nationofchange.org/solution-america-s-economic-decline-1367588690</a></p>
<p>Also, like and follow me on Facebook at <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/For-Economic-Justice/347893098576250">http://www.facebook.com/pages/For-Economic-Justice/347893098576250</a> and <a href="http://www.facebook.com/editorgary">http://www.facebook.com/editorgary</a></p>
</div>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/20/america-youth-unemployment_n_3306089.html?show_comment_id=254608434#comment_254608434">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/20/america-youth-unemployment_n_3306089.html?show_comment_id=254608434#comment_254608434</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8165/americas-youth-unemployment-problem-could-cost-18-billion-over-the-next-decade-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Poor Live In Suburbs Than In Urban Areas</title>
		<link>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8156/more-poor-live-in-suburbs-than-in-urban-areas/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=more-poor-live-in-suburbs-than-in-urban-areas</link>
		<comments>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8156/more-poor-live-in-suburbs-than-in-urban-areas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Reber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreconomicjustice.org/?p=8156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 20, 2013, Emily Alpert writes in the Los Angeles Times while the percentage is greater in cities, the number of poor in suburbs is higher than in urban areas. Bucking longstanding patterns in the United States, more poor people now live in the nation&#8217;s suburbs than in urban areas, according to a new [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://foreconomicjustice.org/8156/more-poor-live-in-suburbs-than-in-urban-areas/mari-cruz-loads-groceries-into-her-car-outside-the-families-forward-warehouse-sized-pantry-in-irvine/" rel="attachment wp-att-8157"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-8157" alt="Mari Cruz loads groceries into her car outside the Families Forward warehouse-sized pantry in Irvine" src="http://foreconomicjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/la-1429444-me-0516-suburban-poverty-5-dpb-jpg-20130519.jpeg" width="600" height="411" /></a></p>
<p>On May 20, 2013, Emily Alpert writes in the Los Angeles Times while the percentage is greater in cities, the number of poor in suburbs is higher than in urban areas.</p>
<blockquote><p>Bucking longstanding patterns in the United States, more poor people now live in the nation&#8217;s suburbs than in urban areas, according to a new analysis.</p></blockquote>
<div>
<blockquote><p>As poverty mounted throughout the nation over the past decade, the number of poor people living in suburbs surged 67% between 2000 and 2011 — a much bigger jump than in cities, researchers for the<a id="ORNPR000099" title="Brookings Institution" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/social-issues/brookings-institution-ORNPR000099.topic">Brookings Institution</a> said in a book published today. Suburbs still have a smaller percentage of their population living in poverty than cities do, but the sheer number of poor people scattered in the suburbs has jumped beyond that of cities.</p></blockquote>
<p>The reality is that millions and millions more are destined for poverty subsistence both in urban areas and suburbs.</p>
<p>We need, going forth, to recognize that tectonic shifts in the technologies of production will increasingly replace human labor with non-human means of production, and without extending equal opportunities to own (not equal results but equal opportunity for capital credit) more millions and millions of Americans will be displaced from their jobs and not be able to find a job, especially a job with decent wage or salary earnings to support a family. Then what? The hoggist greed of narrow minded, money-focused own-at-all-cost hoarders, needs to be confronted and opportunities for FUTURE private, individual ownership of FUTURE economic growth dramatically expanded to enable EVERY American to become a capital share owner in the assets of the major corporations that produce the bulk of our products and services, all financed using insured capital credit loans that will pay for themselves.</p>
<p>See my article &#8221;The Path To Eradicating Poverty In America&#8221; at <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/the-path-to-eradicating-p_b_3017072.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/the-path-to-eradicating-p_b_3017072.html</a> and &#8220;The Path To Sustainable Economic Growth&#8221; at <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/sustainable-economic-growth_b_3141721.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-reber/sustainable-economic-growth_b_3141721.html</a>, and the article entitled &#8220;The Solution To America&#8217;s Economic Decline&#8221; at <a href="http://www.nationofchange.org/solution-america-s-economic-decline-1367588690">http://www.nationofchange.org/solution-america-s-economic-decline-1367588690</a></p>
<p>Support the Capital Homestead Act <a href="at http://www.cesj.org/homestead/index.htm">at http://www.cesj.org/homestead/index.htm</a> and <a href="http://www.cesj.org/homestead/summary-cha.htm">http://www.cesj.org/homestead/summary-cha.htm</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-suburban-poverty-20130520,0,1639664.story">http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-suburban-poverty-20130520,0,1639664.story</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8156/more-poor-live-in-suburbs-than-in-urban-areas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saving Our Economy With Public Banking</title>
		<link>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8147/saving-our-economy-with-public-banking/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=saving-our-economy-with-public-banking</link>
		<comments>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8147/saving-our-economy-with-public-banking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Reber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreconomicjustice.org/?p=8147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 20, 2013, Carl Gibson writes in Nation Of Change: Despite its name, the Federal Reserve is a private corporation, unaccountable to our government and autonomous in its operation. Even though the president appoints the chairman and the board of governors, the Federal Reserve and its 12 regional branches in America’s major cities are dominated [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://foreconomicjustice.org/8147/saving-our-economy-with-public-banking/publicbankingsavingeconomy052013/" rel="attachment wp-att-8148"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-8148" alt="PublicBankingSavingEconomy052013" src="http://foreconomicjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/PublicBankingSavingEconomy052013.jpeg" width="480" height="288" /></a></p>
<p>On May 20, 2013, Carl Gibson writes in Nation Of Change:</p>
<blockquote><p>Despite its name, the Federal Reserve is <a href="http://www.truth-out.org/speakout/item/13984-lets-nationalize-the-federal-reserve">a private corporation</a>, unaccountable to our government and autonomous in its operation. Even though the president appoints the chairman and the board of governors, the Federal Reserve and its 12 regional branches in America’s major cities are dominated largely by Wall Street. Through the devious process of <a href="http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/socialist-standard/2010s/2012/no-1298-october-2012/fractional-reserve-banking-refuted">fractional reserve banking</a>, have complete control over our monetary policy, as well as responsibility for price control and establishing long-term interest rates. It shouldn’t be any surprise to anyone that this private corporation allows Wall Street to withdraw billions of dollars at<a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/money_12849.htm">0.75% interest</a> while homeowners and college students depend on those same banks for loans have to pay far higher rates. The buddy-buddy relationship the Federal Reserve has with Wall Street was fully revealed after the Fed’s first official audit in 2011, when the Fed’s records showed they had dished out <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/traceygreenstein/2011/09/20/the-feds-16-trillion-bailouts-under-reported/">$16 trillion in bailouts</a> to not just US banks, but foreign banks as well. That’s a trillion dollars more than the United States’ <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_%28nominal%29">entire GDP for 2011</a>.</p>
<p>The Fed posted a whopping <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/21/federal-reserve-profit-2011_n_1369354.html">$77.4 billion</a> in profit in 2011. While, to its credit, the Fed gave almost all of their profits back to the U.S. Treasury, those profits were made while buying up the same toxic mortgage-backed securities that Wall Street intentionally created to fail while enriching themselves. The Fed’s quantitative easing policy, known as QE3, is simultaneously shoveling <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-13/fed-plans-to-buy-40-billion-in-mortgage-securities-each-month.html">$40 billion per week</a> into the black hole of Wall Street’s coffers to keep buying up these worthless, obtuse financial instruments. The Fed claims that quantitative easing has helped create or save almost 2,000,000 jobs since 2008, and while that may be true, the people could probably find a much better way to spend $40 billion a month and create and save far more jobs.</p>
<p>Because the privately-operated Federal Reserve still has a monopoly on our money supply, the [Bank of North Dakota] BND still has to ultimately borrow money from the private banking cartel. However, the BND still supplies tens of millions of dollars to the state treasury every year that can be used for badly-needed investments in things like schools, healthcare and transportation infrastructure. Imagine if we could nationalize the Fed and our money supply, using the BND’s model for all 50 states to safely deposit their money and make low-interest loans available to everyday homeowners and small business owners! It would bring Wall Street to its knees.</p>
<p>Luckily, the Public Banking Institute is teaching everyone how we can make that happen at their 2013 conference at Dominican University from June 2-4 in San Rafael, California.</p></blockquote>
<p>The concept of public banking is one that should be pursued in order to establish the institutional means to achieve access to the rights and power of property as a fundamental human right. Instead, universal access to property rights is ignored.</p>
<p>This is the reality of the FUTURE, unless you and I and every other human being with a desire to be someone and contribute to the betterment of society do something about it. It all comes down to what source of income will each of us gain access to and whether we will Own or Be Owned in the economic sense.</p>
<p>The statement “Own or Be Owned” suggests the two alternative worlds of the FUTURE. Today&#8217;s reality is that the average citizen does not own wealth-creating productive capital assets (as do the wealthy rich people in our society). To change one&#8217;s plight from that of capital-less or under-capitalized and solely dependent on a job or government welfare assistance in one form or another, citizens must share in the ownership of the money system. Most of you out there do not even know how money is created. Money is created when the Federal Reserve Bank (a central bank privately owned) loans it to banks that you have your checking account or meager savings account (if any) with, and the banks re-loan it multiple times because laws allow them to have a fraction of the amount on hand or in reserve in relation to the amount of loans they are allowed to make (fractional banking). This creates boom and bust cycles in the national economy, and empowers an elite few who really OWN America. With proposed Capital Homesteading, the Federal Reserve would serve as a &#8220;public bank&#8221; and would loan money directly to citizens, who must put it in a personal special super-IRA retirement account which would invest in dividend-paying stocks of corporations that use the money for productive, economy-growing purposes. This would empower all, instead of an elite few and eliminate fractional-reserve boom and bust. It would also provide for unlimited private sector growth, and eliminate the need for socialist welfare programs funded with tax extraction and national debt. This would back the currency with real products or goods and services and reduce the size and scope of government. As government becomes smaller because individual citizens are able to support themselves and their families living off dividend income and resulting REAL jobs, national debt would be retired and demand for taxes would shrink. The tax system would be changed to be far simpler, flatter, and fairer. And all of us would be on the path to prosperity, opportunity, and economic justice to pursue our personal desires and experiences as we become strongly independent and responsible.</p>
<p>Everyone reading this article is invited to visit and consider joining the Web site of the Coalition for Capital Homesteading, an advocacy group advancing the Just Third Way vision and comprehensive system reforms designed to achieve a people-empowered, market oriented, property-based approach to economic democracy at local, regional, and national levels.</p>
<p>What I and my colleagues at the Coalition For Capital Homesteading (<a href="http://capitalhomestead.org/">http://capitalhomestead.org/</a>) are recommending is that the Federal Reserve become a more accountable and effective engine of non-inflationary private sector growth. We are asking the President and Congress to call on the Federal Reserve to use its existing discount powers under Section 13, paragraph 2 to open up a new source of mass purchasing power through widespread worker and citizen ownership of productive capital.</p>
<p>Today the Federal Reserve uses its powers to monetize unsustainable government debt, bail out banks deemed &#8220;too big to fail,&#8221; and widen the gap between the top 1 percent and the bottom 99 percent. The Federal Reserve could play a more positive role, removing artificial barriers to equal citizen access to acquiring and owning productive capital wealth. By creating asset-backed money for production, supported by growth-oriented tax policies, the Federal Reserve could truly help promote shared prosperity in a market system.</p>
<p>Chairman Benjamin Bernanke and other members of the Federal Reserve need to wake-up and implement Section 13 paragraph 2, which directs the Federal Reserve to create credit for local banks to make loans where there isn&#8217;t enough savings in the system to finance economic growth.</p>
<p>I urge those interested to examine the systems logic behind the Capital Homestead Act&#8217;s tax and monetary reforms, expressed in &#8220;A New Look At Prices And Money&#8221; published in the Journal of Socio-Economics (<a href="http://www.cesj.org/binaryeconomics/price-money.html">http://www.cesj.org/binaryeconomics/price-money.html</a>)</p>
<p>Sign the Petition at <a href="http://signon.org/sign/amend-the-federal-reserve.fb27?source=c.fb&amp;r_by=3904687">http://signon.org/sign/amend-the-federal-reserve.fb27?source=c.fb&amp;r_by=3904687</a></p>
<p>Sign the Petition at <a href="http://signon.org/sign/reform-the-federal-reserve.fb23?source=c.fb&amp;r_by=3904687">http://signon.org/sign/reform-the-federal-reserve.fb23?source=c.fb&amp;r_by=3904687</a></p>
<p>Sign the WhiteHouse.gov petition at <a href="https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/amend-federal-reserve-act/GYqvqGr6">https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/amend-federal-reserve-act/GYqvqGr6</a></p>
<p>The answers are to be found in the proposed Capital Homestead Act at <a href="http://www.cesj.org/homestead/index.htm">http://www.cesj.org/homestead/index.htm</a> and <a href="http://www.cesj.org/homestead/summary-cha.htm">http://www.cesj.org/homestead/summary-cha.htm</a>, and the Agenda of The Just Third Way Movement at <a href="http://foreconomicjustice.org/?p=5797">http://foreconomicjustice.org/?p=5797</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nationofchange.org/saving-our-economy-public-banking-1369063062">http://www.nationofchange.org/saving-our-economy-public-banking-1369063062</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foreconomicjustice.org/8147/saving-our-economy-with-public-banking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 2.125 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-24 16:49:46 -->
